With my user warrior tournament on hold, I've been thinking of some fights I've wanted to do. I've been kincking around the idea of a sort of re-matchs for ancient warriors warriors from the show, but in army form, at least where applicable, where the warriors fight in armys under the leadership of a specific warrior, with X-factors for both the leader and army, like Generalship of the General, and cohesion for the army.

The only reservation I have about this is I don't really know if it violates the battle policy of using warriors used in the show. It would be like redoing the fight, but I believe there is suffceintly differant so that it wouldn't be against the policy, but I want to make sure it's okay with the other Admins.

If I can do this the fight will be under specific scenarios, in what would be most likly. Like for Roman vs Rajput, it would be under the the scenario of the Roman army invading India, so the Rajput would have a terrain advantage and being fighting a defensive war.

For named warriors the fight would be reorginized into large conflicts with and army that represents what they would of lead, with a combination of troops including peaseants up to elites.

Also I'd be including more weapons, becasue the larger numbers of warrior feilded would allow for a larger range of equipment, and I'd also be including armor variarion with percentages of the amount of the armor types to give the ida of how many warriors in the army have the armor type. Like say in a Roman army it could be 30% wearing Lorica segmentata, and 60% Lorica Hamata. This is just an example and proably won't represent the actual percentage of armor distribution If I do this.

Now this is all dependent of whether I'm allowed to do this or not, I would like the Admin opinion of this and whether they think it's okay to do,